Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
28 June 2007 A New Species of Leech from the New York Metropolitan Area
J. LESLIE HUGHES, MARK E. SIDDALL
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Placobdella ali, n.sp., a sanguivorous glossiphoniid leech, is described from material collected in Harriman State Park, approximately 50 km north of the island of Manhattan, New York City. The new species resembles Placobdella ornata and could be easily confused with Placobdella papillifera. Dorsal papillation and internal reproductive anatomy distinguish P. ali from existing descriptions of the latter. Ventral pigmentation and salivary anatomy distinguish it from the former.

Introduction

Placobdella Blanchard, 1893 is a principally North American genus of freshwater, ectoparasitic glossiphoniid leeches. They are commonly found feeding on turtles and other aquatic tetrapods. Definitive characters of the genus include two pairs of closely apposed eyespots, ovarian lobes that bifurcate anteriorly, and a pair of caecate mycetomes housing endosymbiotic bacteria connected to the esophagus below the proboscis (Siddall et al., 2003).

Many of the currently valid species of Placobdella were described (in the genus Clepsine) by Verrill (1872, 1874; and see Moore, 1952). Given the ubiquity of Placobdella in lakes and ponds throughout the northeastern United States, it was surprising to find a new species of this genus in such proximity to metropolitan New York City. The heterogeneous pigment patterns known for species of Placobdella, coupled with incomplete or inaccurate descriptions, makes some species identifications difficult (Sawyer and Shelley, 1976; Davies and Wilkialis, 1982; Barta and Sawyer, 1990) such that this new species could have been mistaken for other papillated species in the genus.

Materials and Methods

Leeches were collected in Silver Mine Lake, Harriman State Park, Orange County, New York (41°17′69N, 74°03′50W), by checking the underside of branches submerged in approximately 20–50 cm of water. Relaxation and fixation in ethanol was accomplished according to the protocols in Oosthuizen and Siddall (2003). Examination of external morphology and dissections were accomplished with a Nikon Coolpix 5700 and a Nikon SMZ-U stereomicroscope with a SPOT-RT digital camera. Drawing of internal morphology was made by superposition of vector art on placed images in Adobe Illustrator. Numbering conventions are those traditionally used for leeches; body somites are denoted by roman numerals from anterior to posterior; and annuli in each somite are given alphanumeric designations.

Rhynchobdellida Blanchard, 1893

Glossiphoniidae Vaillant, 1890

Placobdella Blanchard, 1893

  • Placobdella ali, new species

  • External appearance (figs. 1–9): Body ovate-lanceolate, opaque. Somites I and II uniannulate, III and IV biannulate, V–XXIV triannulate, XXV biannulate at margin though uniannulate medially, and XXVI sufficiently subdivided to be biannulate at margin although uniannulate, and XVII biannulate. Base color brown. Anterior medial light stripe, II–V, fading to VII (figs. 1, 3). Two to four pairs paramedial brown stripes from III to X (figs. 1, 3, 6). Medial dark interrupted stripe from X to anus (figs. 1, 4). Midbody metameric pigmented marginal patches on annulus a2. Venter smooth, with 10–12 lateral brown stripes extending to margins (figs. 2, 5). Green chromatophores randomly arranged on dorsum and venter. Midbody annuli ventrally subdivided. Male gonopore conspicuous at XI/XII, female gonopore conspicuous at XIIa2/a3 (fig. 5). Caudal sucker pigmented except at positions of 14 radiating rows of three tubercules and secondary papillae. Two pairs of eyespots (in II and III) in typical placobdellid arrangement.

    Figure 1–11

    Placobdella ali, n.sp. 1. Dorsal, incident lighting. 2. Ventral, incident lighting. 3. Anterior dorsal pigmentation pattern. 4. Dorsal view of live leech illustrating major papillation series. 5. Ventral, transilluminated. 6. Dorsal, transilluminated. 7. Dorsal surface of posteriormost somites. 8. Tubercules and papillae. 9. Marginal papillae. 10. Diagrammatic representation of internal anatomy: pr, proboscis; ms, medial salivary gland; ls, lateral salivary gland; at, male atrium; md, male sperm ducts; ov, ovaries; ov*, anterior accessory lobe of ovaries. 11. Midbody dorsal papillation patterns. Somites are demarcated by solid lines, annuli by interrupted lines. Primary medial (Pm) and lateral (Pl) as well as secondary paramedial (Sp) and marginal (Sm) tubercular series are demarcated by solid circles; papillae associated with those series are represented by dots. Additional tubercules not in series are demarcated by interrupted circles.

    i0003-0082-3578-1-1-f01.gif

    Three most prominent longitudinal tubercular rows include: one row irregular medial series on a1, a2, and a3, largest on a2, from VIIIa2 through XXIIa3; two rows irregular lateral paired series always on a2 from VIa2 through XXIVa2, often on a3 from XVI through XXII (excepting IXX), occasionally on a1, largest on a2 and often with laterally associated simple pointed papillus (figs. 1, 4, 11). In addition to preceding three rows, less prominent marginal row of tubercules usually, but not always, on a2 from XXIIa2 through XXIIa2 (excepting IXX). Medial prominent row of tubercules replaced posteriorly (fig. 7) by paired inner paramedial rows in XXIII and XXIV. These, and lateral series together, replaced by outer paramedial paired series in XXV–XXVII. Midbody annuli warty, each typically with 23–28 irregularly spaced (i.e., not forming regular series) secondary tubercules and minor papillae not forming series described above: normally two tubercules bracketing single pigmented papillus on either side of a2 between the medial and lateral prominent tubercular series. Typically three or more tubercules on a1 and a3 between the medial and lateral prominent tubercular series. Marginal papillae prominent (figs. 9, 11). Tubercules stellate (fig. 8), bearing a full cap of five to six sensory papillae. Midbody annuli weakly subdivided between tubercules. Ventral blood vessel unusually prominent, visible in a live leech under transilluminating light (fig. 6).

    Alimentary tract (fig. 10): Proboscis muscular, not strongly tapered, unlooped when retracted, base at X/XI. Salivary cells arranged in two pairs of glands; medial glands club-shaped, extending anteriorly to VIIIa2; lateral glands from IX to X, bilobed, posterior lobe three times larger than anterior lobe. Pair of short lateral cecate mycetomes from esophagus in IX/X only. Six pairs foliaceous gastric caeca (figs. 5, 6) including postcaeca, first pair occupy XI–XIV. Four pairs intestinal caeca. Anus in furrow between the two annuli (between a1/2 and a3) of XXVII.

    Reproductive anatomy (fig. 10): No common oviduct. Ovarian lobes from XIIa2 to XVII, with robust accessory anterior lobe from bifurcation in XIII anteriorly to XII. Male atrium weak, in XI giving rise ventrally to male ducts. Ventral blood vessel same color and thickness as (and easily confused with) ovaries in posterior somites. Male ducts strongly coiled, robust, restricted to XI and XII. Testisacs in six intersegmental pairs.

    Type Locality

    Silver Mine Lake, 41°17′69N, 74°03′50W, Orange County, New York, 216 m.

    Type Material

    Holotype, collected on 17 June 2006, AMNH Annelida 5327. Additional material, paratypes, dissected, AMNH Annelida 5328, 5329.

    Etymology

    Noun in apposition in honor of our field assistant Ali.

    Hosts

    Unknown, although blood was found in gastric caeca of some specimens.

    Remarks

    Placobdella ali resembles P. papillifera, P. ornata, P. multilineata, and P. burresonae in that all are papillated species of this genus. The highly regular papillation patterns of Placobdella multilineata (Yang and Davies, 1984) and P. burresonae (Siddall and Bowerman, 2006) easily differentiate the two from P. ali. Additionally, P. multilineata and P. burresonae have weakly developed salivary glands in contrast to those of P. ali and most other species in this genus.

    A close comparison of the external morphology of P. ornata and P. ali is hampered by the vague and often contradictory species accounts for P. ornata. Both have heavily papillated dorsal surfaces with tubercules bearing full caps of senory papillae (Moore, 1901). The most prominent tubercules of P. ornata form three to seven longitudinal series on the dorsal surface (Verrill, 1874; Moore, 1901; Miller, 1929), although Sawyer (1972) suggested that the tubercules are more randomly arranged. Furthermore, P. ali has 10–12 longitudinal ventral stripes, whereas P. ornata has no organized ventral pigmentation pattern (Verrill, 1874; Sawyer, 1972). Placobdella ornata and P. ali also are easily distinguished on the basis of their salivary gland morphology. The lateral salivary gland of P. ali is bilobed, with the posterior lobe being significantly larger than the anterior lobe. In contrast, the lateral salivary gland of P. ornata is bilobed, with each lobe being roughly the same size (Siddall, 1991; Moser and Desser, 1995).

    In terms of external appearance, P. papillifera is the species most similar to P. ali of all of the papillated Placobdella species. Both are heavily papillated, with large tubercules forming longitudinal rows. Both have papillated caudal suckers, a posterior bifurcation of the medial turbercular series into paramedial series, and both have striped venters. However, even in these characters there remain substantial differences. The tubercules of P. papillifera are simple cones, bearing at most three sensory papillae (Verrill, 1872; Moore, 1952; Meyer and Moore, 1954; Sawyer, 1972). The tubercules of P. ali typically bear a full cap of five to six sensory papillae. The medial and paramedial rows of tubercules are restricted to the neural annuli (a2) of P. papillifera (Meyer and Moore, 1954; Davies and Wilkialis, 1982); in contrast, the medial and paramedial series of P. ali include tubercules on all midbody annuli. The medial row of papillae on P. papillifera is replaced posteriorly by two inner paramedian rows at XXIV (Meyer and Moore, 1954). This is also characteristic of P. multilineata and P. burresonae (Siddall and Bowerman, 2006). The medial series of P. ali also splits paramedially in XXIII and XXIV, but then deviates to a pair of outer paramedial rows anterior to the anus in XXVII, a character apparently unique to this species.

    Absolute comparison to P. papillifera is no longer possible owing to the dried and contracted state of Verrill's holotype (see Moore, 1952 and Meyer and Moore, 1954). Nonetheless, with respect to external anatomical characters, Meyer and Moore (1954) convincingly rediscovered and redescribed Clepsine papillifera (sensu stricto—there were four varieties detailed by Verrill, two of which eventually proved to be species of Helobdella). The redescription of P. papillifera by Meyer and Moore (1954) was based on leeches collected in Manitoba, Canada, and was later corroborated by additional material collected by Davies and Wilkialis (1982). Sawyer and Shelley (1976) detailed a southern variant of P. papillifera from the Carolinas, complete with a description of the internal anatomy. They admitted to some reservation regarding the identification (Sawyer and Shelley, 1976: 69), and with good reason. The leech from South Carolina had no distinct rows of papillae (Sawyer and Shelley, 1976) and apparently no middorsal series. Furthermore, the ventral stripes were described as blue, like those of P. parasitica, not brown. Regardless of the status of the leech described by Sawyer and Shelley (1976), it can still be differentiated from P. ali on the basis of those external characters as well as internal anatomy. The male reproductive ducts of P. ali are limited to somites XI and XII only, whereas the sperm ducts of P. papillifera (s.l.) descend to XIV. Additionally, the ovaries of P. papillifera (s.l.) extend to XX, and the anterior ovarian lobe splits off in XV. The ovaries of P. ali are shorter, terminating at XVII/XVIII, and the anterior lobe splits off in XIII.

    Acknowledgments

    We thank Ali and Aimee Siddall and Liz Borda for their assistance in collecting leeches. We thank the Palisades Interstate Park Commission for permission to collect in Harriman State Park. This research was supported by REU and PEET grants from the National Science Foundation (DBI 0353817 and DEB 0119329).

    References

    1.

    J. R. Barta and R. T. Sawyer . 1990. Definition of a new genus of glossiphoniid leech and a redescription of the type species, Clepsine picta Verrill, 1872. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68:1942–1950. Google Scholar

    2.

    R. W. Davies and J. Wilkialis . 1982. Observations on the ecology and morphology of Placobdella papillifera (Verrill) (Hirudinoidea: Glossiphoniidae) in Alberta, Canada. The American Midland Naturalist 107:316–324. Google Scholar

    3.

    M. C. Meyer and J. P. Moore . 1954. Notes on Canadian leeches (Hirudinea), with the description of a new species. The Wasmann Journal of Biology 12:63–96. Google Scholar

    4.

    J. A. Miller 1929. The leeches of Ohio—distribution of the species together with what is known of their occurrence, food, and habitat. Columbus, OH The Ohio State University Press. Google Scholar

    5.

    J. P. Moore 1901. The Hirudinea of Illinois. Bulletin of Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History Urbana 5:479–547. Google Scholar

    6.

    J. P. Moore 1952. Professor A. E. Verrill's fresh-water leeches—a tribute and a critique. Notulae Naturae Philadelphia 245:1–15. Google Scholar

    7.

    W. E. Moser and S. S. Desser . 1995. Morphological, histochemical and untrastructural characterization of the salivary glands and proboscises of three species of glossiphoniid leeches (Hirudinea: Rhynchobdellia). Journal of Morphology 225:1–18. Google Scholar

    8.

    J. H. Oosthuizen and M. E. Siddall . 2003. The freshwater leeches (Hirudinea) of South Africa with a key to all species. In. Guide to freshwater invertebrates in southern Africa. Book 5. Pretoria, South Africa Water Research Commission. Google Scholar

    9.

    R. T. Sawyer 1972. North American freshwater leeches, exclusive of the Piscicolidae with a key to all species. Illinois Biological Monographs 46. Google Scholar

    10.

    R. T. Sawyer and R. M. Shelley . 1976. New records and species of leeches (Annelida: Hirudinea) from North and South Carolina. Journal of Natural History 10:65–97. Google Scholar

    11.

    M. E. Siddall 1991. The life history, untrastructure, and epizootology of Haemogregarina balli (Apicomplexa: Adeleina: Haemogregarinidae) and phylogenetic implications. Master of Science thesis,. University of Toronto. Toronto, Canada. Google Scholar

    12.

    M. E. Siddall and J. Bowerman . 2006. A new species of Glossiphoniid leech from Rana pretiosa (Amphibia: Ranidae) in Oregon. Journal of Parasitology 92:855–857. Google Scholar

    13.

    M. E. Siddall, S. L. Perkins, and S. S. Desser . 2003. Leech mycetome endosymbionts are a new lineage of alphaproteobacteria related to the Rhizobiaceae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30:178–186. Google Scholar

    14.

    A. E. Verrill 1872. Descriptions of North American fresh-water leeches. American Journal of Science and Arts 3:126–139. Google Scholar

    15.

    A. E. Verrill 1874. Synopsis of the North American fresh-water leeches. Report of Commissioner of Fish and Fisheries 666–690. Google Scholar

    16.

    T. Yang and R. W. Davies . 1985. The morphology of Placobdella multilineata (Hirudinoidea: Glossiphoniidae), a parasite of Crocodilia. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63:550–551. Google Scholar
    J. LESLIE HUGHES and MARK E. SIDDALL "A New Species of Leech from the New York Metropolitan Area," American Museum Novitates 2007(3578), 1-6, (28 June 2007). https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0082(2007)3578[1:ANSOLF]2.0.CO;2
    Published: 28 June 2007
    Back to Top